Mobile: +86 133-1157-0713

 
E-mail:


Mobile: +86 13311570713
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
+86 (10) 8268-9699 or +86 (10) 8266-8266 (ext. 153)
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
Fax: +86 (10) 8266-8268
Dear visitor,you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please to enjoy access to our databases . If you are not a subscriber, please . Should you have any questions, please contact us at:
據此，判決康捷空公司向三星財險補償貨色損失人民幣890192.16元。 ．．．．．． ．．．．．．
處于保險期間的5月10日，三星通信公司從天津濱海國際機場起運，途經韓國仁川機場至美國邁阿密機場的22票貨物丟失，三星財險公司向三星通信公司賠付1189972.5美元。三星財險公司取得代位求償權後提告狀訟，根據航空運輸合同關系要求航空分運單的簽發人康捷空公司承當補償責任。
No. 5 of Twelve Model Foreign-related Civil and Commercial Cases Applying International Treaties and International Practices Published by the Supreme People's Court: Beijing Kangjiekong International Freight Forwarding Co., Ltd., v. Samsung Property & Casualty Insurance Company (China), Ltd. Tianjin Branch and Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. (subrogation right dispute) 最高人民法院發布12個涉外民商事案件合用國際條約和國際老例典型案例之五：北京康捷空國際貨運代理有限公司與三星財產保險（中國）有限公司天津分公司、大韓航空公司代位求償權糾紛案
— Determining the legal nature of the "period of two years" in Article 35 of the Montreal Convention and unifying the standards for the application of law in disputes arising from international carriage by air ——明白《蒙特利爾公約》第三十五條之兩年時代的功令性質 同一國際航空運輸膠葛功令合用尺度
[Basic Facts] 【根基案情】
On January 30, 2015, Samsung Communications Company purchased insurance for the carriage of exported goods from Samsung Property & Casualty Insurance Company (China), Ltd., Tianjin Branch, covering carriage via any scheduled commercial flight. On May 10, within the period of insurance, 22 shipments of goods sent by Samsung Communications Company from Tianjin Binhai International Airport to Miami Airport in the United States, with a stopping place at Incheon Airport in South Korea, were lost. Tianjin Branch paid indemnity totaling 1,189,972.5 U.S. dollars to Samsung Communications Company. After obtaining the subrogation right, Tianjin Branch filed a lawsuit requesting Beijing Kangjiekong International Freight Forwarding Co., Ltd. (Kangjiekong), the issuer of the house air waybill, to bear compensation liability based on the contract for carriage by air. 2015年1月30日，三星通訊公司向三星財險公司投保出口貨色運輸保險，運輸體式格局包羅利用任何按期商用航班的飛機。三星財險公司在本案中向康捷空公司主張索賠的權力並未喪失。連系《 》第 對公約吸收的規定，認定我國國內法關于訴訟時效中斷的劃定一樣應合用于該公約劃定的兩年時效，即該時效可因權力人提告狀訟而産生間斷。
[Judgment] 【裁判結果】
After the trial upon appeal, the Third Intermediate People's Court of Tianjin Municipality held that Article 35 of the Montreal Convention required an action to be brought within a period of two years. While the Convention did not explicitly address the interruption or suspension of this period, it provided that the method of calculating that period should be determined by the law of the court seized of the case. Given that Article 135 of the Civil Aviation Law of the People's Republic of China incorporated the provision of the Convention, the court concluded that China's domestic law on the interruption of limitation periods was applicable to the two-year period under the Convention; namely, the limitation periods might be interrupted by an action brought by the right holder. Tianjin Branch was not barred from exercising the right to claim compensation from Kangjiekong Company in this case. Considering that Article 24 of the Convention established a system for reviewing the limits of liability based on the inflation factor, determining the limit of liability effective at the end of the court debates in this case as 22 Special Drawing Rights per kilogram under the principle of fairness did not violate the principle of non-retroactivity of law. Accordingly, Kangjiekong Company was adjudged to pay 890,192.16 yuan to Tianjin Branch in compensation for the loss of goods. 天津市第三中級人民法院二審認為，《蒙特利爾公約》第三十五條劃定了兩年時代內提告狀訟，雖沒有劃定該期間的間斷、中止，但劃定對期間的較量爭論遵照案件受理法院的法令肯定。公約第二十四條確立了責任限額複審軌制，斟酌到該制度是基于通貨膨脹身分設置，基于公平原則，以本案法庭辯論終結時現行有用的責任限額尺度即每千克22個稀奇提款權作為限額計較根據，其實不違背法不溯及既往原則。
     
     
若有問題請來電咨詢；
您好：您而今要進入的是北大法律英文網會員專區，如您是我們英文用戶可直接 ，進入會員專區查詢您所需要的信息；如您還不是我們 的英文用戶，請 並交納響應費用成為我們的英文會員 。



以下內文出自: http://lawinfochina.com/display.aspx?lib=case&id=9938&EncodingName=big5




近期公可可轉債資訊：昇陽半導體二發行日期：2025-01-22、耀登二發行日期：2025-01-10、六方科一KY發行日期：2025-01-15、揚秦一發行日期：2025-01-15、皇普四發行日期：2025-01-17、亞力二發行日期：2025-01-13、博智一發行日期：2025-01-10、旺矽五發行日期：2025-01-08、上曜六發行日期：2024-12-27、皇普三發行日期：2024-12-31、華星光四發行日期：2024-12-25、新美齊四發行日期：2024-12-25、三地開發一發行日期：2024-12-19、jpp三KY發行日期：2024-11-04、倍力一發行日期：2024-11-04










離婚證人







結婚證人







法拍屋 、台北法拍屋 、新北市法拍屋 、桃園法拍屋
行政院今朝正在研擬打詐專法，專法應#設置高額的檢舉獎金，透太高額獎金讓內部組織分化，瓦解內部結構才是打詐可以或許成功的方式。檢舉獎金係因與檢舉查獲金額連動而有道德風險， ...車碰
2025年1月11日 — 剃光頭 · hak1 fu2. 白話(2). 粵語, 拼音, 界說, 註釋, 又作, 又音. 光頭仔 · gwong1 jau4 · 剃光頭髮的人, 指年
文章標籤
全站熱搜
創作者介紹
創作者 josiahdfsnb 的頭像
josiahdfsnb

代位求償

josiahdfsnb 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣(0)